12/11/09
A suggestion to adopt China’s sadistic one-child policy was discussed at Copenhagen this week; of course a reaction of outrage ensued…
An editorial in Canada’s Financial Post backed the idea, without mentioning what actually happens in China—women are kidnapped off the streets, drugged, and forced to undergo compulsory abortions.
In her editorial on Tuesday, columnist Diane Francis wrote that, “A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate.”
Just days later, the Chinese government delegation at the Copenhagen climate change conference argued that the Communist dictatorship’s one child policy should “serve as a model for integrating population programs into the framework of climate change adaptation.”
They said that China’s population program has made “a great historic contribution to the well-being of society.”
As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400 million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao said.
As we have exhaustively documented, the overpopulation myth is often cited by control freak phony environmentalists as a justification for the implementation of drastic policies, yet it has no basis in reality whatsoever.
In one case earlier this year, both a young woman and her baby were killed after such an abduction in Liaocheng City.
“According to a Doctor at the hospital where the two died, the young woman was kidnapped by the “Birth Control Office” and taken to the hospital where she was forced to undergo an abortion procedure,” reported the Epoch Times.
“The young woman fought with staff to protect her unborn child however a half a dozen men, pushed her down on a bed and injected her with a drug to induce labor. After the young woman had a still birth, she developed a massive hemorrhage and soon thereafter died.”
Some responses to Diane Francis’ column:
“This is a rather simplistic analysis of a fix that would be anything but simple in its implementation. Are we going to establish a policy of forced abortions and forced sterilizations, too? As the younger demographic shrinks, are we going to cut pensions and establish euthanasia?”
“So, Diane, please tell us: which of your TWO children would you be willing to give up for the sake of the planet. I mean we’re talking about the extinction of our species here. Surely, you can’t put a value on the life of just ONE of your children, can you? How selfish is that? Stupid Marxist.”
“Is this serious? Tell me Diane, what are you willing to do to someone who breaks this policy? Not some anonymous government agent that lets you keep your hands and conscience clean, but you yourself.”
“Dianne, If the fascist nazism that you espouse ever materializes here in America, population control as an issue will cease to exist. There will be a revolution. The second amendment lives for such.”
“If the author had bothered to do some homework, she would have realized that western cultures are already breeding themselves into extinction. Can’t grow a populace with only 1.8 births/family. And those 40 million single asian males with no prospect of finding wives will not rise up one day.”
